Reflection Paper for Week of Jan 22, 2008: INTRO TO ONLINE COMMUNITIES CMGT 534 (North)
Favored Blog:
Of the different blogs available, I would like to propose the Movable Type (MT) blog available through USC's Web Services (currently in beta). The reasons for this are as follows:
· MT is a robust blog environment that is hosted by TypePad already, but that is also in beta locally at USC and hosted by Information Technology Services (ITS). This local hosting allows for direct feedback for the nuances of usage here at USC toward a robust set of options available to the wider USC community.
· MT is already used by the School of Cinematic Arts' Interactive Media Division (SCA's IMD) for their 'active' or 'live' website (http://interactive.usc.edu/). This same model can be applied to the APOC program.
· MT was used by the Annenberg Center and managed by the Annenberg School. Thus expertise lies with the IT department at Annenberg, and this may provide impetus to migrate the Center's old site(s).
· Given the above, there is a local 'community of practice' already in place, consisting of end users and IT support persons. This CoP around MT can be developed toward reaching a critical mass that embraces the benefits of a blog environment - one that exposes the student to the outside world of experts.
As a runner up, I would propose Blogger.com because it is known to many users and also enjoys a wide and local 'community of practice,' especially in light of the Google Apps at USC rollout that will likely include blogger (and the JotSpot Wiki very soon).
But here I am ... a week later using Blogger.com ... in the end, it's just easier to use and available.Favored Wiki:
Having used Confluence, WikiMedia, and WetPaint, I am partial to these. However, I have no real preference and I am eager to learn about other wikis, especially PBWiki. However, when it becomes available, I was very pleased with the JotSpot Wiki before it was purchased by Google. As part of Google, it is under wraps but is rumored to be very robust as a collaborative environment.
Blog Sites:
OK -- I clearly didn't get this assignment the first time ... I got it now. Having missed some key information the first day of class made it crazy.1. TechCrunch: An excellent business oriented feed that covers the social software aspects of corporate America (and the world) without abandoning the essential ingredients of openness and modularity associated with Web 2.0.
2. PaidContent.org: Another business oriented blog feed, but with a more social economic bent and a more global bent. I am only getting oriented with this site, but appreciate the business models that are made clear on this site. For example, the recent earnings report from Apple that looks at the granular details of where the earnings are coming from, and why these are likely to decline or at least forecast to decline in the year ahead.
3. Engadget: I use this site often for reviews on the latest and greatest electronic gear, from computers to handhelds, from projectors to rear-projection monitors; and into the realm of camcorders, digital cameras, and more. This site is invaluable for understanding and comparing different electronics for specific applications and uses.
4. Mashable: I read this feed daily, and have this on my Facebook site. It is a great overview of what is happening in the world of Web 2.0 as companies and widgets collide. Mashable is my favorite Web 2.0 feed, and never fails to be first -- well, most of the time!
5. Digg: I am not a regular of Digg, and do understand its principles. I am drawn to its founder, Kevin Rose, who has persevered despite his 'age' (not so old here, but in Web 2.0 terms, he's ancient) and succeeded! Rose debunks the overarching Gen X traits of base greed and shallow commitments to principles and ideas. Digg itself seems very time consuming -- I need to revisit it more often to build a better understanding.
Next Generation Media: The Global Shift:
While this paper is an excellent statistical overview and inspiring textual review of the "Internet" and how the next generation of media, including Web 2.0/social software, mobile technology, and e-commerce is 'transforming' how we interact and share knowledge; alas, it remains largely hyperbole filled with references and 'expert' assessments from persons who only recently accepted the significance of what they claim to prognosticate.
The pinnacle of this contradiction comes with the concluding remarks from former FCC Chair Reed Hundt, who concludes that 'new media are creating a new vision of the relationship between the individual and society.' It is extremely difficult to take Mr. Hundt seriously when one considers (and having lived through) his tenure as FCC Chair during the explosion -- ground zero -- of the Internet and World Wide Web during the early 1990s and extending through into the new Millennium. At that time, as with Vice President Gore, Mr. Hundt was focused primarily on cable television and accommodating the old media guard, especially the networks. With respect to the Web or Internet (or the Information Superhighway or National Information Infrastructure, as it was called then), Mr. Hundt and Mr. Gore were primarily interested in the 'clipper chip' and in providing the United States federal government with the ability to monitor all data flows on the Web or Internet (or NII). Indeed, their 'vision' was one that was very much in favor of government control, and this was clearly also borne out by the types of regulatory decisions and ideas proposed by Mr. Hundt. What is more, once he left his post, Mr. Hundt immediately provided consultation services to the cable and private sector entities that he and the FCC had (and the FCC continues to) control.
To be sure, while Bill Clinton was clearly a visionary and understood the significance of the Web; he certainly did not support the idea of a direct democracy via the Web or in the form of the "Open Source Democracy for the Digital Age." And arguably with good reason; perhaps best underscored when one considers that it was Ross Perot who supported such a move in the 1992 US presidential elections -- and no other candidate.
As with the Perot proposals of the early 1990s around such a direct democracy system supported by Web technology, the debate and discussion completely skirts the critical essence of the foundations of the United States republic and democracy -- which is founded on the principle of representational democracy. This principle was alluded to as a kind of bullet point made by Reed Hundt (again, discrediting much of its meaning) but not as a historical tenet of the United States democracy and republic. It does seem essential that first the topic of direct democracy versus representational democracy be exhaustively debated and discussed before the technology is literally thrown at this question without regard to who we are and where we came from as a nation.
Aside from these observations and criticisms, I found the data on the mobile technology to be somewhat misplaced. Clearly we should not be seeking more hyperbole -- at the same time, the data suggests a sea change and it would have been helpful to the reader to understand more about the implications of mobile technology rather than as an afterthought for the 'magnificence' of the Web.