
This past week, Google's stock rallied after reports indicated that the current downturn in the US economy is not affecting Google's bottom line ability to generate online ad revenues. As reported by AFP:
While there is still much to be said about the prospects of the US economy, it is noteworthy that US ad revenues for Google were surpassed during the first quarter by international ad sales, specifically Europe, and that Google lost at Yahoo's expense, according to ad agency tracker and service provider SearchIgnite. But this does not by any means indicate that we are out the woods when it comes to the fickle tastes of web surfers and the volatility of the online advertising market.Analysts credit Google's unrelenting focus on helping people find what they want on the Internet and then matching search results with online advertising they are likely to click on.
Google makes the bulk of its cash from "pay-per-click" advertising, and the company reported 5.19 billion dollars in revenue during the quarter while the US economy was rife with talk of recession.
"Google's business model is making sure advertising hits the mark," Global Crown Capital analyst Martin Pyykkonen told AFP.
Quoted today in the New York Times, front page editor Streeter Seidell of highly lucrative site CollegeHumor.com:
[The New York Times] said of us in 2007, “No one can accuse this site of not understanding Web video.” So we sure seem to know what we’re doing, huh?This uncertainty in the online advertising market might bode well for Yahoo!'s latest positive data that might indicate a strengthening, especially against Google, and thus might increase Yahoo!'s bargaining power against Microsoft's buyout offer. As well, this past week, Yahoo! and Google formed a partnership of sorts around what amounts to Google AdSense ads appearing next to Yahoo! search results.To be honest, though, we don’t. Nobody in the online content business truly does.
The taste of the Internet user is as idiosyncratic as it is fickle. What is popular and funny one day could be clichéd and boring the next. (“Chuck Norris is so tough” jokes, anyone?) There are certain common traits of viral content that loosely guide our selections — it should be short, easily understood, universal, nostalgic — but for every hit sharing those qualities there are millions of similar failures, not to mention stuff that simply defies explanation.
All of this indicates more and more that while Google, Yahoo!, and possibly Microsoft will continue to dominate online advertising revenues, the advertising pie - a limited pie even in good times - may be shrinking or let us say, not growing, in the next year and perhaps beyond, depending upon economic growth in the US and abroad.
It also indicates that there is no substitute for quality, and while the latest widget might create an online herd sensation and bring in dollars quickly, sustainable models will depend upon sustainable, quality content that is consistently in demand. In the end, the good news for content creators, including writers, artists, designers, musicians, and reporters, is that consistent quality will be rewarded over the long run, albeit, short run groundswells might create short-term profits that are enormous.
